Yes, if you mean earning links. Google says links are one of the ways it understands which content may be helpful to searchers, and that they're good for sites to receive "as long as they're well deserved". Its link analysis systems, including PageRank, are still part of its core ranking systems. What isn't worth paying for is link building that manipulates rankings: buying links, swapping them at scale or planting them with automated tools. Google treats that as link spam, works to cancel out its effect, and can hit a site with a manual action. The value is in links people choose to give you.
This guide explains what Google has said about backlinks, where the line sits between link building and link spam, when you need to worry about bad links, and how to judge an agency's link-building proposal before you sign.
Do backlinks still matter to Google?
They do, but they're one signal among many. Google's guide to its ranking systems says it has various systems that look at how pages link to each other to work out what pages are about and which might be most helpful for a query. PageRank, one of the core systems Google launched with, has "evolved a lot" since then and is still part of its core ranking systems.
Google's public explainer on how it ranks results gives one example of a quality factor: whether other prominent websites link to or refer to the content, which it describes as generally a good sign the information is trustworthy.
There are limits. Google's SEO Starter Guide lists PageRank among things not to over-focus on: it uses links and is a fundamental algorithm, but "there's much more to Google Search than just links", and PageRank is one of many ranking signals. A page with lots of backlinks still has to be relevant and helpful to rank.
Links also help with discovery. The same guide says the vast majority of new pages Google finds every day are found through links, which is why internal linking matters as much as links from other sites.
What counts as link spam?
Google's spam policies define link spam as creating links to or from a site primarily to manipulate search rankings. Its examples include:
- Buying or selling links for ranking purposes, including paying money, swapping goods or services, or sending someone a free product in exchange for a post with a link.
- Excessive link exchanges ("link to me and I'll link to you") or partner pages that exist only to cross-link.
- Using automated programs or services to create links to your site.
- Requiring a link in a contract or terms of service without letting the other site qualify it.
- Advertorials and paid articles whose links pass ranking credit, and links with optimised anchor text in articles, guest posts or press releases distributed on other sites.
- Low-quality directory or bookmark site links, links hidden in widgets, links in footers or templates across many sites, and forum comments stuffed with keyword links.

Paid links aren't banned outright. Google says buying and selling links is a normal part of the web's advertising and sponsorship economy, and it isn't a breach of its policies as long as those links are marked with rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored". Our overview of Google's spam policies covers the other behaviours that get sites demoted.





